<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DTV News: Move to digital TV may be costly to some cable customers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tvconversionhelp.com/2008/04/22/dtv-news-move-to-digital-tv-may-be-costly-to-some-cable-customers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tvconversionhelp.com/2008/04/22/dtv-news-move-to-digital-tv-may-be-costly-to-some-cable-customers/</link>
	<description>Converter Box Help at TVConversionHelp.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 22:32:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dixon</title>
		<link>http://www.tvconversionhelp.com/2008/04/22/dtv-news-move-to-digital-tv-may-be-costly-to-some-cable-customers/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Dixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 19:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvconversionhelp.com/?p=36#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Will we beable to get a better reception than we get now and will we beable to pick up more channels. I currently get 2 and 39 on different Tv&#039;s. So I have to go to different rooms to watch Tv. It is boring only getting two chanels. Are we going to have to pay for this new kind of reception? I hope not We can&#039;t afford to pay. I would hate to lose the one free thing left. Everything else has been taken away. People on low incomes can&#039;t afford anything else, everything goes up, except our income. If this new service is going to cost and there will not be anymore channels available, then why do we need to change. Most cabel co already offer HDTV Or the other one. So if it is not going to improve our service, why do we need it? So someone else can get rich?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will we beable to get a better reception than we get now and will we beable to pick up more channels. I currently get 2 and 39 on different Tv&#8217;s. So I have to go to different rooms to watch Tv. It is boring only getting two chanels. Are we going to have to pay for this new kind of reception? I hope not We can&#8217;t afford to pay. I would hate to lose the one free thing left. Everything else has been taken away. People on low incomes can&#8217;t afford anything else, everything goes up, except our income. If this new service is going to cost and there will not be anymore channels available, then why do we need to change. Most cabel co already offer HDTV Or the other one. So if it is not going to improve our service, why do we need it? So someone else can get rich?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

